What does your religion say about Abortions?

What does your religion say about Abortions?

What does your religion say about Abortions?

slkusractiloveme

I also am a christian. of course most would say having an abortion is a sin. im not syaing thats its always the right thing to do. i feel its all about what you are comfortable with and at the end of the day if you can live with the decisions that you make. honestly though i don't feel like as women the right to choose should be takin away...it for me depends on the situation.

slkusracthairypotto

First let me say the obvious. If you ain't preggers it taint none of your business. IMVH and naive O If a woman doesn't want to have a kid she shouldn't. My religion says if you're supposed to be here you will. Abortions, Miscarriages, SIDS and stillbirth are part of the path for the parents. The essence of the baby (soul/aton/thetan/life force) will be born when it's their time.

slkusractBast

I have no religion, but my personal opinion is that abortion should be legal, safe and rare. To that end birth control should be widely available, very affordable (free when necessary) and something about which all are well-educated. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure...

slkusractcadisneygirl

Abortion Human life is a sacred gift from God. Elective abortion for personal or social convenience is contrary to the will and the commandments of God. Church members who submit to, perform, encourage, pay for, or arrange for such abortions may lose their membership in the Church. There are exceptions like in the case of a womans life being in danger and rape and incest, but even with rape and incest counseling is very much advised first before going thru with it.

slkusractDr

as a bahai my religion says that abortions can be done if the parrients are unfit or mentally unprepaired but ingeneral abortions should not be done. in the event that one is to be done it should be decided by both the husband and the wife

slkusractNONAME

God said that he knew us while in our mothers womb. John the Baptist leaped for joy in his mother womb when she met Mary who was preggers with Jesus. Any true Christian cant deny that abortion is murder and a sin in the eyes of God.

slkusractRev

What's religion got to do with abortion? That's a personal choice.

slkusractTim

My denomination (Presbyterian Church in America) is unashamedly pro life. I have thought about this quite a bit over the years. The wide spread of opinions is incredible, matched only by the passion of the activists on all sides. This is an issue that few people are even able to have a civilized discussion about. Complicating it further is that there are few that hold a black-and-white few of the issue. The majority of people in the US see abortion as a giant grey area with varying degrees of abortion considered acceptable. Very few people hold the position of unlimited abortion access or no abortion under any circumstances. Below is the process I went through to come up with my position on the matter. First, I asked myself the question at what point does a human being obtain "personhood" and as such gain all the legal and moral protections that status entitles them to? There are some who say that the point of personhood is 28 days AFTER birth, at which point you still should be allowed to abort. In fact, there is a professor of ethics at Princeton University that actively advocates this position. This is the position that spurred “Born Alive” legislation that says if a woman has an abortion and the baby survives, that doctors cannot withhold care and let the baby die on the operating table. Others say up to the point of birth. These folks would hold that partial birth abortion is a reasonable procedure. Or perhaps just before while the mother is in labor. Or 6 months of gestation or 3 months or three weeks. I wrestled with this for a long time. Then I looked at the issue a different way. Does human life have an imputed value or an intrinsic one? If we say that it is imputed, meaning the value is derived from something else, some outside criteria, then any one of the above positions would be equally valid. We as a society would decide what criteria to select. My problem with this is what criteria do you use? On what basis is a baby at 6 weeks more valuable than a baby at 5 weeks? Is a baby that has not yet developed a heart still a baby? This hit really hard on my wife and I when we lost one of our children. Lynne had a miscarriage a few years ago. When people with strong pro-choice sentiments gave us their condolences, they referred to the fetus as a child, even though she (we named her Grace, even though we do not know for sure if she was a she or a he. It made it easier to explain to the children what happened and easier for Lynne and I to grieve our loss) was at the same gestational point, 9 weeks, that they believed abortion was merely removing some unwanted tissue of the mother. So, the criteria used is whether or not a child is wanted. If that is so, then why? By similar logic, if the value of human life is imputed, it can also be taken away, depending on what some person or group of persons believe that life is worth. So if you happen to be mentally retarded or black or Jewish, it would be perfectly reasonable for you to be killed off for the good of the community if they believe it. I have a friend who is paralyzed from the neck down. There are some in the world who would look at her and say that she has no quality of life or that the money and effort to support her would be better used on others. They would have her die due to her handicap. But knowing her the way I do I find the notion that she is without a quality of life to be ridiculous on its face. She is a writer, a painter, a social worker, and heads up an international charity. I’d call that a pretty good quality of life. So would her husband who married her years after her accident put her in the wheelchair. Thus, the imputed value logic is shown to me to be completely arbitrary. Following any of the “prior to this point it is not human but at this one on it is” positions is likewise arbitrary and does not answer the question of personhood. But consider the proposition that human life has an intrinsic value. That it is valuable simply because it is human life and no other reason. No measure or quantification of the value of it, it is and that is enough. It is sort of like gold. Gold is valuable because it is gold, not because we as a society stood up one day and said, “we are going to make gold valuable”. Gold has an intrinsic value as opposed to an imputed value, such as paper currency. Paper currency is worthless in and of itself. It has value only because we say it has a certain value. This position then would support a clear line between human life and not human life. With this position, you are a human at the point that you have a unique genetic code. In other words, at inception. Prior to inception, there was no “you”. The male and female reproductive components in and of themselves are not a unique genetic code, but merely parts of the donors. It is only when they combine to create new life do “you” begin to be a person. The notion of intrinsic value also carries forward throughout life. My mother-in-law was on dialysis for several months before diabetes finally took her life. There are many who would have said that she should just die and not burden the rest of us. If those persons held the position that human life has imputed value, I can understand. I however, believe that human life is intrinsically valuable and worth preserving and protecting for as long as possible. Thus, we should protect life at the beginning and at the end and at all points in between. So, we come full circle back to the question of abortion. Should it be outlawed? My answer, since I believe in the intrinsic value of human life, is that for the most part it should. Why only “for the most part”? Because there are times when you have to weigh the life of two humans and pick one to live and one to die. My sister-in-law faced such a problem once. She got pregnant from her husband and it turned out to be a tubal pregnancy. Had the child been allowed to grow inside of her, it would have killed her before the baby would have been able to survive on its own. Thus, in weighing these two lives, one would have to conclude that the baby would have to die in order to save the mother’s life. What about cases of rape or incest? I have 5 daughters (yes, that was no typo) and the thought of one of them being raped is always lurking in the back of my mind. If one of them should get pregnant as a result, the hard decision would be to let that child live. Pregnancy is not the extremely dangerous event of the past. Rarely do people die from giving birth. Many more die as a result of complications after an abortion. But the bottom line is that the child is innocent of any crime, so why punish it? I’m not saying it is an easy choice and I can certainly sympathize with those who have had to make it. Perhaps they even made the wrong choice. But, God is a loving and forgiving God, who can even forgive the taking of a human life. Which is what abortion is.

slkusractFaisal

Allah Ta'ala says in the Quran: Life is from a decree of my Lord. (Sura 12 verse 85) the above verse is self explanatory on the sanctity and significance of life. Generally every decree is from Allah Taala but the honour of attribution increases its sanctity and demands its highest level of reference. This command is mentioned in many verses of the Quran: Allah Ta ala says: "Whosoever has spared the life of a soul, it is as though he has spared the life of all people. Whosoever has killed a soul, it is as though he has murdered all of mankind." (sura 5 verse 32) The fact that every one soul is equivalent to all of mankind clearly indicates the value of every life. The above should suffice to express the sanctity of the Rooh (life). It is not permissible under any circumstances to destroy a rooh. The jurists have mentioned the life enters the foetus upon 120 days. From then onwards the foetus is a living human being. Under no circumstances will it be permissible to abort the child. Allah Taala in his infinite knowledge knows the circumstances, inspite of Him Being Most Merciful, He has endowed the foetus with life. Can our deficient mercy to abort the child be compared to Allah Ta ala s Infinite Mercy to sustain the child. The heights of His Infinite Wisdom cannot be reached or comprehended. The importance of the biggest problem in the circumstances cannot be equivalent to the importance of the Rooh (life). It is too dear to be discarded. Before 120 days too, it is not permissible to abort the child. However, it may be permissible to abort before 120 days in the following instances: 1) Rape 2) Incest 3) Sexual interference with the mentally retarded 4) Foetal deformity for eg. anencephacy (no brain) 5) Foetal deformity for eg. congenital rubella health. In view of the above, it is not permissible for your mother to abort the child. And Allah Taala Knows Best. Was salaam Mufti Ebrahim Desai FATWA DEPT. ---------------- In a Hadith related by Bukhari and Muslim, our beloved Rasulullah (Sallallaahu Alayhi Wasallam) said, ‘Verily the creation of each one of you is brought together in his mother’s belly for forty days in the form of a seed, then he is a clot of blood for a like period, then an angel is sent to him who blows the breath of life into him…’ Based on the above references, Muslim jurists have deduced that the first four months (120 days) of gestation is the crucial time period. After this the foetus is regarded as being ‘alive’ and an abortion is not permissible for any reason whatsoever- and, should an abortion be done then it would constitute murder. Thus an abortion may be performed within the 120 days period only if there is a valid Sharee reason. (Family Planning and Abortion- Qaadhi Mujahidul Islam, published by the IMA of South Africa) Upon and after 120 days, it will not be permissible to abort the child. Almighty Allah Ta’ala, the All-Knowing the All Merciful, has endowed the foetus with life. The heights of His Infinite Wisdom cannot be reached or comprehended. The importance of the biggest problem in the circumstances cannot be equivalent to the importance of the Rooh (life). In general, abortion is not permissible but within 120 days as stated above- however, it is permissible to abort the child in the following instances: 1) Rape and incest 2) Proven abnormalities, e.g. Anencephacy (no brain), Downs Syndrome, Trisomy, HIV positive, congenital rubella health. 3) If the foetal abnormalities are not proven but speculated, then, if there is a high risk that a woman may suffer from any of the above factors, then in the opinion of an honest, reliable and an experienced Muslim doctor, abortion may be permissible prior to the four months’ gestation. It must be stressed that these are exceptional circumstances in which an abortion is allowed. Once again, it must be emphasised that the permission granted rests on medical grounds. (Ibid) 4) If there is a high risk of the mother’s permanent mental well being and if the doctor is certain (Zanne Ghaalib) that the depression, schizophrenia will be permanent and incurable. 5) Abortion before 120 days is not permissible due to spacing of children, financial constraints, young age and unwed mothers. --------------------- Muslim scholars have different views about abortion. Some of them forbid it from the first day of conception while other ones allow it before the 120th day of pregnancy when the soul is breathed into the fetus. After that period, all of them agree that it is not allowed unless there is an unavoidable danger on the health of the pregnant mother. In this case, abortion can be performed at any stage during the pregnancy, and as soon as it is clear that termination of pregnancy is the only way to save the life of the mother. This danger should be determined and be based on the judgment and opinion of qualified and trusted doctors (and not the parents or the family). Thank you for asking and God knows best. Source: IslamiCity

Ask

Abortion

Popular Q&A

Im doing a paper on the cons of abortion. I need strong arguments.?
pro-choice should mean the baby gets a choice. Most of them have to do with morality, teaching responsibility. Having a baby stops risky disease spreading behavior. There is an argument having something to do with gender selective abortions in China where they are forced to have abortions...

Why would a woman have an abortion from an accidental pregnancy then..?
The time the accidental pregnancy occurred in the past, she may have been in a terrible situation, possibly unable to care financially or mentally for a child. The second time around, it is a good possibility that she's improved her life and can now look after a children perfectly - mentally...

Terrorists thwarted in Seattle Military Base and Day Care Center Attack. Were they Presbyterian?
What is your point? None of the following terrorists who attacked the U.S. or planned to attack the U.S. are Muslim (to the best of my knowledge): + 1996 + The Centennial Olympic Park bombing in Atlanta, GA, the first of four bombings committed by Eric Robert Rudolph. Two people died, and 111...

Is abortion on demand legal, in most US states, in the second trimester?
Each State has its own legislation. Example: Abortion on demand is not legal in South Dakota, the life of the mother must be at risk, the law there is so restrictive (I think widely acknowleged as the most restrictive laws of all in the USA): http://law.findlaw.com/state-laws/aborti... Canada...

What all legal things do we need for an abortion?
cost depends on whereyou get theabortion done. in government hospital its free. you need to be more than 18 year old and notrmally should be accompanied by some one who can take care of you